Thanks for visiting. For more information and background on our effort to overturn the council’s decision to issue new debt to pay for old debt, please read the category TIF/TIRZ District Refinance.
Category Archives: Town Center
I have a new post on KCL regarding legal threats to our petition. Check it out.
Doug and I, and several others, will be launching a petition drive to overturn the council’s (so far) unanimous intent to pay off old debt with new debt, while refusing to even consider budget cuts as an alternative.
And what better occasion to knock the dust off of Keller City Limits? Except this time I’m calling it Keller Citizen Legislature, because that’s effectively what we are.
I wrote a Letter to the Editor regarding the Town Center TIF, but never sent it in. But Les Reagan has one that hits the mark.
Following the articles in both the Keller and Ft. Worth newspaper regarding the mess that successive City Councils have given us over Town Center I had a warm and fuzzy feeling of vindication.
The countless letters I wrote warning about the coming storm were not well received. Actually one mayor called and asked me to stop the letters. I have now passed that point and come up with a solution, unless the taxpayers have no problem paying off this folly.
Somewhere out there in business land there must be a company that wants an obscene looking headquarters building, albeit it being poorly designed as far as usable space. The City could sell it and maybe find someone to buy the Recreation Center and let it become a taxable entity also. Had the City fathers only listened and remodeled the old grocery store on 377 into an attractive headquarters and let some developer lose his tail on a strip shopping center and apartments, which is what Town Center has evolved into, property taxes wouldn’t have to be so high.
Well it’s too late to cry over spilled milk, but it would help if future Councils were more attuned to citizens comments but whoa that seems to be a national problem too.
–Les Reagan, Keller
Beginning at 5pm tonight, the city council will be discussing charter revisions with Julie Tandy, Steve Trine, Jim Badalementi and Jim Carson. Should be fun. Cable channel 27 or 31. I’ll post my notes on this later.
Later in the evening, the city council will be discussing the TIF restructuring Doug and I have been talking about for weeks (and years).
Update: Here are my notes for the Charter meeting:
Section 2.02 General Powers Adopted
I do not favor adding Charter language that explicitly embraces the power to borrow money and sell bonds for economic development.
Section 3.01 Number, selection, term.
Background: I think Keller is a wonderful city with relatively few problems as compared to other cities. But there is always room for improvement. Based on prior experience, I believe Keller’s greatest need for improvement is voter apathy. The people I talk to are often well-informed on the politics and policy of Washington, but poorly informed on Keller’s issues. The really sad part is that they have far more power to effect change in Keller than Washington. Undoubtedly, the lack of well-informed voters is a key reason for our single-digit voter turnout percentage.
From this principle, I am an ardent supporter of well-contested elections. While far from perfect in terms of informing the voters, I can’t imagine achieving a dent in voter apathy without them.
I am against adding a seventh member to the council for this reason. Adding a seventh council member would only dilute the pool of qualified candidates and result in fewer contested elections and greater voter apathy.
Mr. Lowry seems to accept as axiomatic that the council should have an odd number of voting members to avoid tie votes. Why? I see nothing wrong with tie votes—they just mean the motion does not carry. What’s fundamentally wrong with that?
If tie votes are really a problem, it’s best to leave the council as it is. The only way to have a tie is if both the mayor and exactly one council member are absent, which is rare. But with a voting mayor and a sixth council member, the far more common case of one council member absent results in the possibility of a tie vote.
I mildly favor extending the term of council members to three years. Mostly because of the extraordinary learning curve required. While this may result in fewer contested elections, I rather doubt that it would, and even if it did, the extra year spent learning the ropes is worth it.
I mildly disfavor term limits. Term limits arbitrarily throw out the good with the bad, and do nothing to better inform voters.
I strongly oppose districting. Keller, despite a few squabbles, is remarkably demographically homogenous. As such, there is no reason to expect that any candidate from one section of town would fail to fairly represent residents of another section of town. Plus, districting would dramatically reduce the pool of qualified candidates for well-contested elections.
Section 3.05 The mayor.
I am ambivalent about giving the mayor a vote. What I would like see the council and Charter Commission discuss is, not just a mayoral vote, but the full range of customary executive powers, including voting, veto power, and line item veto power over the budget.
Section 3.11 Prohibitions and ethics
Though I’m against term limits for council members, I am very much in favor of term limits (sorta) for key staff. But since that’s not on the agenda, see me if you’d like to discuss.
Section 5.01 City manager.
“Someday, [not appointing a city manager to a defined term] could cause a problem for the city, as the practice when hiring a city manager generally involves a contract in recent years.”
The “practice” in recent years is wrong, at least for Keller. When the Charter restricts the council to working solely through city manager for the administration of virtually all functions, it is crucially important for the council to maintain power and authority over the city manager. Just imagine the insult of having to buy out for hundreds of thousands of dollars a city manager whose incompetence and/or moral turpitude has already embarrassed the city.
Section 7.02 Petition
As a general rule, I think recalls, initiatives and referendums should be difficult, but doable. Keller has only had two successful petitions in the last fifteen years, so I feel strongly that the petition process is difficult enough.
I would suggest that the too subjective language “adopt such ordinance or resolution without alteration as to meaning or effect in the opinion of the persons filing the petition” be amended to “such ordinance shall be liberally construed in favor of the petitioners’ intent.” Or something like that.
There is precedent for such language. In Brown v. Todd, argued October, 2000 before the Texas Supreme Court, the Justices ruled:
We noted further that because the people’s initiative and referendum power is reserved, not granted, to them, “such charter provisions should be liberally construed in favor of the power reserved.”
I’d like the council to consider breaking these ballot measures into two separate votes. Given the number of changes that need to be made, I’m very worried that voters will be overwhelmed with all the items. Would you consider putting all the noncontroversial items on the November ballot, and the controversial items on the May ballot?
Been a very busy week and not a lot of time in front of a computer. We were able to break away for a few days to head to San Antonio for Spring Break. But as soon as we got to town, we learned that my dad had suffered a stroke. He seemed to be OK, so we continued on with our vacation but decided to cut it short and come home on Friday just in case. Saturday morning, we found out he had yet another stroke, this one doing some damage creating some loss of movement on one side of his body. He still remains in the hospital, but seems to be in good spirits even with everything he has gone though. We still await the results of a slew of tests that will be forthcoming in the next few days.
I spent the afternoon Saturday in the new Keller library doing some research for the City Council session Tuesday….while a great improvement, it still appears as if they have a little bit longer to get everything up and running. Speaking of the City Council Meeting, I plan to give my opinion to the Council on why I think this idea of refinancing is both irresponsible and avoidable. If I have to make a sudden trip to go see my dad, Shannon said she would sub for me and read my “speech.”
Saturday night we decided at the last-minute to head to Hank’s in McKinney to go see Cory Morrow play. Yes, it was blizzard like conditions, yes, we were crazy to do it, but yes, we had a great time. Got to hang out with Cory for a time after the show and seems that he has signed on to a new CD this year with Pat Green. Next show for us will be Jack Ingram in the coming weeks.
Ranger’s Manager Ron Washington failed a drug test last year…..oh brother was my reaction. Could we just fire him now and get it over with?
Bart Stupack got what he ultimately wanted….name recognition. Too bad he sold out 30 years of being pro-life for it.
If a book encourages its reader to order three more of the author’s books, I think it’s worth mentioning here. Lynne Olson’s Citizens of London is such a book. I read it this week while on vacation and learned a great deal I didn’t know before.
The Indians continued their winning ways Friday night with a win over Central. They faceoff with District Powerhouse Grapevine at Keller Tuesday night. Should be a good gauge on where Keller will end up in 5-5A.
When they took my dad in for his second MRI in as many days Saturday morning, they asked what music he would like to listen to. He told them to put some AC/DC on….while my 66 year old father was laying there listening to his music, a tech came in and shocked I guess that it was playing asked the other tech who put that music on? The Tech laughed and said that’s what the man wanted.
I don’t know what song was playing, but this is one of my dad’s favorites.
Mitchell Schnurman tackles Keller’s TIF (TIRZ) troubles in today’s FWST:
It’s always discouraging to watch a forty-minute discussion with a reporter boiled down to a sentence and a paragraph, but Mitchell’s treatment of me and Keller’s TIF issue is quite fair. My only issue is a mild beef with the headline. While job cuts are very painful to the individuals laid off, these cuts would not result in any service cuts to Keller’s taxpayers. In fact, such cuts are pain relief to taxpayers who will no longer be required to pay people to do nothing.
Waste is painful; good governance is not.