I had a little time today so I wrote an email to the City Manager about the Budget, it is as follows:
As a citizen, I am concerned over the Council wishing to put infrastructure improvements on hold in lieu of cutting salaries. Salaries are a rising cost every year, so if you don’t cut them this year and things don’t improve in the economy, you still have the $400,000 from this year effecting next year’s budget.
I feel for any employee having to take a pay cut, but the numbers of unemployed citizens in Keller is nearing 10% and there doesn’t seem to be an end. These are the people having to pay the taxes that support the city, some consideration must be made to them.
The private sector is cutting wages or hours on a daily basis. The company I work for has reduced our employees by over 50% in the last 8 months and we don’t know if that will be the end of it. My wife who worked for a large pharma company was laid off in February and it took her until the first of August to find a job. This is a woman who never had to look more than a week or two to find a job at anytime in her life.
Road Repair has been behind in Keller since I moved here a decade ago. I have seen my street go from a newer street to one with pot holes and standing water due to lack of maintenance by the city. Without immediate repair, my street and others will be unrepairable and will need to be replaced, costing the citizens more money in the long run because the City didn’t do it’s job. I know you inherited these issues, but please help the Council see that saving money today will cost us all in the long run.
In your budget you state “Development related activities have dropped to levels not seen since 1996 including a reduction of approximately 1.33 million dollars in the last two years”(pg xv) and Building permits/development fees continue a steep decline as the proposed budget expects a decrease in FY2010 of $849,000 or 49% from the FY 2009 adopted budget” (page xvi) With those statements, I would have to ask why do we have staffing for 2007 levels if we are seeing 1996 levels? In the private sector, you would have to make the tough decisions and lay people off in those under performing departments. Why is that not a consideration?
The National League of Cities did a study (http://tinyurl.com/nvs4s9) that was published today in which it it states: (Page 7):
2009 represents a critical turning point for city fiscal conditions. The impacts of the current economic downturn are evident in city finance officers’ assessments of their ability to meet fiscal needs, in projections for 2009 revenues and in the actions taken in response to changing conditions. Since city fiscal conditions tend to lag behind national economic conditions, the effects of a depressed real estate market, low levels of consumer confidence and high levels of unemployment will likely play out in cities well into future years. National economic forecasts are not projecting immediate and substantial improvements in the nation’s economic conditions, meaning that the nation’s cities will most likely still be realizing the effects of the current downturn in 2010, 2011 and beyond. The outlook for the nation’s cities in the next year includes a number of concerns:
- Real estate markets tend to be slow to recover from downturns, which will be particularly true this time around as housing values recover from the largest real estate decline at least the past 40 years, meaning that a rapid rebound in property tax revenues is unlikely in the next few years;
- Other economic conditions — consumer spending, unemployment and wages — are also struggling and will weigh heavily on future city sales and income tax revenues;
- Large state government budget shortfalls in 2010 and 2011 will likely be resolved through cuts in aid and transfers to many local governments as states have historically balanced their budgets in part by such actions;
- Three of the factors that city finance officers report as having the largest negative impact on their ability to meet needs are employee-related costs for health care coverage, pensions and wages. Health care costs, in particular,are increasing at a faster rate than city revenues. This reality is unlikely to change in the near future, placing added fiscal strain on city budgets;
- Tightened credit markets have made it increasingly difficult for cities to maintain debt-funded projects, particularly for infrastructure, and have resulted in higher debt costs;
- Facing revenue and spending pressures, cities are likely to continue to draw down ending balances; and
- Public concern about government taxes and spending in the midst of recession, combined with the 2010 election year, conspire to raise the prospect of political efforts to permanently constrain local authority, limiting the tools available to public officials to offset declining fiscal conditions.
All items are pretty much common sense, and seeing the study I wonder how bad next year’s budget will be? You made a statement the other night at the Budget Workshop that Keller needs to really think about their future revenue streams (in talking about the Westlake Fire Dept. Co-op), I would go one step further and state the City needs to really look at the expenditure side. After 15 years of double digit growth, there is bound to be fat in departments that needs to be addressed.
Thanks for your time,
He responded within 30 minutes:
The Council gave me four major parameters within which to create this year’s budget. 1. No raises for employees. 2. No lay-off of employees. 3. No tax rate increase over the 1 cent they agreed to support for debt. 4. No service level cuts. My proposed budget was within those parameters. In order to meet these four parameters and not present a budget with a huge deficit, I proposed an across the board salary decrease.
The parameters were given to me in a budget workshop back in March. Since that time the economy took a turn for the worse (as you know.) I think the Council is now rethinking their 4 parameters and trying to decide what they are willing to support.
I think this year is a wake- up call. It is true that we may not ever get back to “normal” and that a “new normal” will emerge in the next year. I think the City will have to respond.
I know my position on the budget isn’t making me any friends at City Hall these days. Again, I go back to the fact that over half of our elected officials work in the aviation business, they have personally seen pay cuts and staffing level decreases. I work in a business that makes the Airline Business look non cyclical in nature….we make hard decisions about staffing levels every day. I have to ask them, would AA still be in business if it had the staffing levels it did in 1995? The answer is no, it would have gone the way of TWA, Eastern, Pan AM, Braniff and a host of other airlines. The difference here is you are asking your constituents to have to pay for your insistance of no staffing or pay cuts, both out of our pockets and in the form of reduced service levels in terms of road repair.
It’s time to face the facts, you need to untie the City Manager’s hands and let him propose a budget without the four constraints you have placed on him, but time is running out. Three of you ran on the platform that prior council’s meddled too much in day to day operations, let the man do his job. There needs to be cuts, and they need to happen this year. Next year or the year after are not going to bring you back to 2007. The City Manager realizes it, it’s time you do also. If you don’t belive me, read the study I have linked to above, it’s a sobering look at what could happen.
Some will ask why I don’t address KISD in the same way….well to tell you the truth, I’ve nearly given up. I said nearly. I did get a response from them today on where they magically came up with the money for the raises, I will try to post it later tonight. Now, I have to get home to watch the Rangers Double Header, probably the most important two games of the season.